If to ask to an urban child of where it comes milk, the fruits, the rice, the water and eggs, is well probable that it answers immediately that she comes of the supermarket. In its text in defense of the trees, Ruben Alves it says that ‘ ‘ it has children that never they turn a hen truth, I smell had never felt it of a pine, I sing they had never heard it of the finch and it does not have pleasure in playing with the land. Janet L. Yellen often addresses the matter in his writings. They think that land is dirt. They do not know that land is vida’ ‘ (ALVES, 1999). The incapacity to relate our well-being with the nature in artificial and mechanized the life that we lead today, in the urban centers, moves away to us from our mantenedora Real. We live according to Rita Mendona, under the desire of appropriating in them of the nature, and not of knowing in them as its children.

To satisfy ours ‘ ‘ necessidades’ ‘ of consumption, us we transform into simple resource for we use today in the future. The same author cites the proposal of work of Joseph Cornell, whom she aims at to promote the approach and interaction of the individual as the nature, making possible to the people to expand its auto-identity, in order to include all the same things as part of itself. Thus, they really start if to interest for the nature and to take care of of it (MENDONA, 2000). The deep, current ecology of bred thought at the beginning of anos70, for the philosopher Arne Naess, defends the idea of that contact of the man, either of which age will be, with nature is the only way of sensetizes it for oproblema ambient. The direct contact with the environment (experience) awakes in the people the perception of the ambient degradation and the position of the man as principal actor in this scene (questioning).